Home Questions & Answers

Submit an interesting question to the board and we'll circulate it to our members who are most knowledgeable on weighing and sampling and post the answer here. Send your question by email to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 



Question 12 PDF Print E-mail

QUESTION

Where is the +/- 2 percent error written in terms of the accuracy of the volume and density measurements to determine the tons in a physical inventory?
ANSWER
The answer you are looking for isn’t in the difference between the found physical number vs. the books.  The accuracy/error [i.e. the precision or repeatability, ed. note] is calculated based on the methodology and equipment.  Very similar to the +/- in a scale.  Both (volume and density) errors, once calculated are combined to come up with a total tonnage error for a physical inventory.  These error calculations can be found in the ASTM Standards for density, volume, and tonnage.  Both are based on standard deviations of “calculated” confidence intervals.  National Map Accuracy Standards actually drive the error in volume to below 2%.  The volume error is calculated based on the pile height and it’s mapped contour interval, therefore, the higher the pile with a 1 foot contour interval, the lower the error.  The same thing can be said for density, the more tests taken should drive the standard deviation that is calculated lower, the lower the standard deviation and the higher number of tests gives you a lower calculated error.

The errors are then combined in a square root of the sum of the squares as depicted in the ASTM standard.  Giving you a total %error for tonnage.  Here is a sample rough calculation:

C = Ö(D2 +A2)             Where:                      C = combined error (percent)

                                                                      D = percent density test error

                                                                      A = percent volumetric survey error

Several factors are considered in the volumetric survey error calculation:

1.     Aircraft flight height above the ground surface.

2.     Focal length of the camera.

3.     Stereo compilation instruments used to read and collect the digital data.

4.     National Map accuracy standards.

5.     Contour interval.  (Compiled in 1 ft. intervals.)

A series of variables based on the above factors results in a vertical accuracy of approximately 0.50 feet.  The percent volumetric survey error is then calculated using the equation:

                     A = (±0.50 feet/ average pile thickness) x 100%

The average pile thickness for the Main Pile was calculated to be 51.28 feet.  Using these numbers, the percent volumetric survey error is:

                        AInactive  = (±0.50 feet/ 51.28 feet) x 100% = ± 0.98%

The percent density test error is calculated using the estimated error at the 98% confidence interval and the corresponding average wet density using the following equation:

                        D = (estimated error at 98% confidence interval / average wet density) x 100%

The average wet density (linear regression method) for the Main Pile was 67.6 pcf with an estimated error at the 98% confidence interval of 0.7 pcf.  Using these values, the percent density test error is:

                                DInactive      = (±0.7 pcf / 67.6 pcf) x 100% = ±1.04%

With D and A calculated, the combined error (percent) in tonnage for each method is:

                                CInactive      = Ö[(±1.04%)2 + (±0.98%)2] = ±1.43%

With the combined error calculated for the tested pile, the following error statements can be made in regards to tonnage (wet weight basis) reported:

                  Pile                          386,470.0 tons ± 5,526.5 tons

As you can see, these are based on statistics and this is used as an example only.  The calculations are found in the ASTM standards. Therefore, the higher the piles and lower the density standard deviation (which can be accomplished with exceedingly increasing number of tests or consistent pile construction) the lower the overall PHYSICAL INVENTORY measurement error. 

 
Question 11 PDF Print E-mail

QUESTION

On page 2-10 HB44 Item S.2.1.3.1. Automatic Zero Tracking Mechanism (AZTM), the maximum load that can be re zeroed is 3.0 divisions.  What if a truck spills more than this amount at one time?  Does this statement mean each time AZTM is engaged it can adjust zero as long as it doesn't exceed 3.0 divisions?  Does this mean as trucks spill small amounts not exceeding 3.o divisions AZTM will keep resetting zero?

ANSWER

If a truck scale spills more than the equivalent of 3 divisions on the weigh platform the truck scale operator is supposed to either clean off the material or do a manual auto zero.  If the truck spills less than 3 divisions the ASTM will zero the truck scale.  The truck scale operator must be aware that the sum of the truck scale tare weight and net weight must not exceed the gross capacity of the truck scale thus the truck scale operator must clean off the truck scale prior to this condition.

 
Question 10 PDF Print E-mail
What's the difference in basis weight of a .008 caliper and a .010 caliper C2S board?

Answer: The following answer was given to us by Bruce Thompson, President of Thompson Equipment Company New Orleans, a supplier of  equipment to the paper industry.  0.008 and 0.010 caliper paper board is also referred to as 8pt and 10pt respectively.  The ideal basis weight would be 10 lbs per pt.  So the basis weight of the 0.008 and 0.010 are 80 lbs and 100 lbs respectively, however the C2S is coated on both sides adding 10 lbs per coating or a total of 20 lbs.  Therefore the ideal basis weight is 100 lbs and 120 lbs or the difference of 20 lbs.  Their is a great savings by making these numbers.  Simple answer; there is a 20 lb difference between 0.008 and 0.010 caliper C2S board.
 
Question 9 PDF Print E-mail

My company produces a product and ships it by conveyor  to our customer.  We have a belt-conveyor scale as a basis of payment.  It doesn't meet HB44 and we can't material test it at this point.  My boss said they have an agreement with their customer to use this scale  for payment.  I maintain this scale and I'm sure the customer is getting more than it shows.  There are other people involved that receive benefits from this scale.  I'm sure they are not aware of HB44 and its requirements.  What is the NW&SA response to this question?

Got an answer?  Email it to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it and win an NW&SA coffee cup, notepad, or ball cap. We'll post the answers here.

 
« StartPrev123NextEnd »

Page 1 of 3